Argumentative Dimensions and Inferential Energies in Sheikh Al-Qaradawi's Maqasid Texts

Abstract

We know that studies have been repeated about Sheikh Al-Qaradawi in explaining his intentional sense, explaining the facts of Islam and implementing falsehoods, following up opinions on the jurisprudence of Allah in Sharia and creation, and monitoring explanatory investigations and dual interests and evils... etc. I do not seek to repeat the above, but I go to another course that examines what Qaradawi formulated from selected texts in which the argumentative foundations and inferential mechanisms of its millennium after a long stay in the work of the Sheikh has been presented in a style that highlighted the purposes of the texts, and the establishment of the argument to the effect, and to achieve persuasion when the recipients, especially in an era in which events are accelerating, cultures are mixed, and requirements vary, which requires appropriate control between the constants of Sharia and the changes of the times.

Since the argument constitutes an important aspect of the study of language within the framework of its use, and an entrance to the interpretation of texts with persuasive formula, and a requirement for persuasion and influence, and the correction of perceptions of the jurisprudence of priorities, I have chosen to study the intentional discourse of the Sheikh from the point of view of argumentative reasoning, by addressing the links and factors of argument, and peace with the laws of negation, reduction and heart, and the types of argumentative reasoning with semi-logical arguments definitional and pluralism and the division of the whole into parts, and arguments establishing reality by causal link, representation, direction and situations.